The debate is settled; the consensus is 'we don't have a consensus.'
I would love to see the current definition of "consensus" for Bitcoin changes because if that means 100% support for doing something then the whole project is royally screwed.
There has been no endeavor of importance in human history where unanimity was required on all decisions.Satoshi is a pragmatist because he has >50% majority baked into deciding how the blockchain grows. That is the consensus he came up with and anything better is a "nice-to-have".
Yes, we know, you'd like it to be a democracy. Fortunately Bitcoin works exactly against that principle.