Thank you for your contribution! Your presence is always welcomed. Always been a fan of your insight and skills.
I'll readily admit I am wrong if John Conner is able to show some details and convincing proof against Sybil attacks on the global lock consensus.
It's your duty to prove it not mine.
Bullshit.
I am calling scam on this coin now:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1148745.msg12111401#msg12111401Inability to prove something on a controlled testnet is not the same as sustaining Byzantine tolerance on the open internet. Besides, no one has time to go diving into your code to prove that. $2100 bounty can't buy more than a couple of days of my time. And I can't even be sure you haven't controlled something on the testnet that prevents proving the point, until I dig in and then I might lose the time. Sorry. I am working on something now that is worth $millions or more, so why would I stop to mess around in your testnet. Sorry!
You have an obligation to show in your white paper how the Byzantine fault tolerance is achieved.
Operation shit coin clean out in underway. No more bullshitters will be allowed.
Edit: also with the bountry denominated in VNL, then by the time it is paid out, it will probably worth 0. Because you will have already proved that the coin is broken.