- The launch was not perfect, nothing was hidden, Evan wanted a relaunch but the community said no.
As I understand it. what was proposed and voted on was not a relaunch but an airdrop. i.e. creating more coins out of thin air to give away.
But the vote was in fact rigged, by closing it early.
It looks like that happened because a few whales didn't like the idea, and, according to Evan (his words), "You can't change the rules in the middle of the game".
And, yet, the rules
were changed in the middle of the game to
cut supply, instead of increase it, boosting the share held by instaminers, instead of reducing it.
So it seems you
can change the rules in the middle of the game, as long as you favor the right people.
Something stinks here. Big time.
Whoa! only 110 votes with 5% difference between yes and no and you decide to abort the vote and lock the thread before 24 hours and conclude that everyone decided not to airdrop?

After I asked many investors that purchased $10-100k USD worth of Darkcoin came out of the woodwork and said that would rob them. You can't change the rules in the middle of the game. It's in the past and we're moving on.
Can you imagine buying $30000 worth of something and then the developers making it worth $15000 overnight to appease a small group of users?
So the community didn't vote, the big holders did (the ones that instamined with you)
Gotcha.

Nope, it was the community that voted.
You just said that you asked the investors, it's even quoted here.
Ah wait, you call "big investores" = community. Gotcha
I asked the community to vote and many of the investors came out of the woodwork (and replied saying what's above). Sorry, my original sentence was confusing.
Community vote for less than 24hrs with 45% for and 55% against, then you canceled the poll and got the thread locked, that's far from a community vote. And you keep admiting that the people that posted had the final word because they had alot invested in DRK.
LOL you just admitted that the "community" = big holders.