What I'm "up to" is I don't like unethical conduct like lying about a launch time, launching early and than instamining millions of coins, then changing the rewards to boost the effective size of the instamine even more. Then continuing to claim there was a "community vote" against a relaunch (when there is no evidence of such a vote, and in fact evidence that insiders squashed a vote on issuing more coins to flatten the distribution, then cut supply to further concentrate it).

If this disgrace of a coin from the start didn't give me so much to criticize, I wouldn't be here criticizing it.

You may continue to claim this is about some sort of "bias" or trying to promote other coins, but anyone with half a brain will see that is not really the case at all -- that criticizing Dash is FAR from the most effective way to promote anything -- and people claiming that I'm doing that are in fact just attempting dismiss and hide my valid and truthful criticisms by attacking me personally.

You can attack me all you want. I'm going to continue criticizing Dash for its unethical history as long as there is a Dash, and if for whatever reason I'm not doing it, someone else will. Because it is all true, and all disgraceful, despite two name changes and a thousand attempts to dismiss it as not important. It's not going away.