I don't know, but you are saying we shouldn't do anything, because doing something might not be quite enough?
I'm saying that the pretense that 1 MBers are playing central bankers seems funny in the light
considering most block increase proponents are the ones arguing for arbitrary control of supply. really? I must have missed something along the way, couldyou please share pointers to evidence on which the bolded claim is based? (serious question)
Blocksize limit = supply.
Unless you advocate lifting it completely most block increase suggestions amounts to a control of supply based on projected demand.
(of course 1MB is an equally arbitrary quota but that is beside the point I was making)