There was some interesting stuff in that post, but I was kind of surprised you don't share my viewpoint about anonymous coins.  If the anonymous function was relatively bulletproof, and reached large circulation and market cap, there would be a high probability of it abolishing the state, or the state as we know it at least.  I know you've talked about how a non-opaque blockchain could allow the state to extract even more than they do currently, so it seems logical an opaque one could put them in a death spiral where it wouldn't function at all.  It will honestly be hilarious watching far leftists cringe in horror as large governments cease to be able to function if this ever does come to pass.

As a side issue, your current username reminds me of the fringe "Report from Iron Mountain", heh.  The thing that says the primary function of the state is war and it cannot exist without it.  It was said to be a hoax, but it has some convincing points.  Obama called the state, "a monopoly on violence", so maybe it was not a hoax.  Either Obama read that report as educational material, or the books from Machiavelli that most world leaders read also teach that viewpoint.