Two clarifications to my prior two posts.
1. For Transfer, my opinion is that adding I2P or Tor creates a false sense of security if the activities you are hiding including anything that is of interest to authorities (tax, criminal, civil law, regulatory law, national security, etc).
2. For Digibyte, what I am trying to to convey he may do himself a disservice by judging everything according to old world norms:
In my opinion, those attributes are antiquated and irrelevant now. And he will likely miss out on the huge gains in cryptoland due to his myopia. I feel strongly enough about this to stand my ground on my opinion. Again I respect his right to disagree.
Although he has a right to his emotional or historical attachment to the brick&mortar economy, I (as AnonyMint and other usernames) have for the past 3 years been writing about the end of the industrial age and the fledgling Knowledge Age.
In the 1980s, I had such a small startup company with physical office, Neocept Inc., 547 Constitution Ave Unit A, Camarillo, California, USA.. And we produced physical packaging for our software and shipped it via UPS every day. I had a warehouse in the back and offices in the front.
But that changed ever since the internet. I did CoolPage.com (a $million business from 1998 to 2006) all myself working from a Nipa Hut in the Philippines.
I think some people are stick stuck in a timewarp. It is like I am 20 years ahead of them.
1. For Transfer, my opinion is that adding I2P or Tor creates a false sense of security if the activities you are hiding including anything that is of interest to authorities (tax, criminal, civil law, regulatory law, national security, etc).
2. For Digibyte, what I am trying to to convey he may do himself a disservice by judging everything according to old world norms:
- retail use
- visible offices
- visible devs
In my opinion, those attributes are antiquated and irrelevant now. And he will likely miss out on the huge gains in cryptoland due to his myopia. I feel strongly enough about this to stand my ground on my opinion. Again I respect his right to disagree.
Although he has a right to his emotional or historical attachment to the brick&mortar economy, I (as AnonyMint and other usernames) have for the past 3 years been writing about the end of the industrial age and the fledgling Knowledge Age.
In the 1980s, I had such a small startup company with physical office, Neocept Inc., 547 Constitution Ave Unit A, Camarillo, California, USA.. And we produced physical packaging for our software and shipped it via UPS every day. I had a warehouse in the back and offices in the front.
But that changed ever since the internet. I did CoolPage.com (a $million business from 1998 to 2006) all myself working from a Nipa Hut in the Philippines.
I think some people are stick stuck in a timewarp. It is like I am 20 years ahead of them.
Haha well seems I can agree with you on some things
but I will add that in my opinion old world services do add some value..
However its meaningless if you support a crapcoin will a supply as bad as Fiat, bitcoin was the first and only has a 21 million limit for a reason.
The reason is each coin can be divided in to 100 million parts, why because the price per coin is meant to go up not down lol
Why these crap coins with billions in supply can still be divided in to 100 million parts I've no idea lol,
that's why I invest in rare supply currencies like Orbitcoin 3.7 million coins, and bitcoin 21 million coins.