John Conner already gave a rebuttal to his last erroneous conclusions. Why should he keep having to deal with this troll?
Perhaps because JC's 'white paper' is severely lacking in any content which would suitably rebut the points being raised?
Your post history concerning this developer and his coin is becoming shillier by the day and your tactic of repeatedly calling people 'Troll' or their assertions 'FUD', are tiresome. We get it, you want people to idolise JC the way you do, but it isn't going to happen unless and until he can actually satisfy the technical issues related to his claims towards having solved 'zero confirmation' transaction vulnerabilities.
It a brave new world in crypto when a developer can post a white paper, and open source code, a attest net that no one can attack and still they apparently need to defend themselves......guess what they don't...don't like the coin don't buy it.