The potential for that chart to be a broad, objective comparison of some of the main 2.0 projects is there, but as it stands it is extremely biased towards NXT to the point where it's not even trying to be subtle about it (only green ticks and under construction in the NXT side...really now?), in addition a cursory glance shows glaring factually incorrect segments.
Please see the third post of this topic. I had already post the chart, but I mention the fact that it was only the Nxt collumn that was up to date. Nxt community will update the chart using the data in the current topic.
For your information, yes Nxt has every "green ticks" and "under construction ticks" for each element mention in the chart.
Nxt is NOT working on Smart Contracts, Automated Transactions, Multisig, Instant Transactions, Anonymous Transactions.
Aye...
1. smart contract is already all written from Cfb, it need to be put into the Nxt code, however there is other priority for the moment.
2. AT, well it depend on how you see this (burst and crypti are Nxt clone, afaik). But I would agree that for now it is not a priority. So that tick could be remove, I give you that one
3. multisig, yes they are working on that for whole account for next hard fork 1.7, now currently only support multisig for individual transaction with two-phase transaction.
4. anonymous transaction, yes coin suffling for NXT and MS is planned for next hard fork 1.7.
5. Instant transaction, I know a Nxt devs is working on this. but I can't remember his name. I would have to dig in the forum.