No. We really don't.
If there is a fork, then one or the other of the two chains dies within a day. Whatever is left is BTC.
If there is a fork, then one or the other of the two chains dies within a day. Whatever is left is BTC.
That was the case in with the previous forks where we had almost 100% consensus before the chain was forked. We now have two people and some followers that try to force the majority to accept their change package. Several people and some pools will not switch to the BXT forkcoin or use both coins BTC and BXT. There are good chances that we will continue with two chains. If this is established as a good way to push changes into the market, we might see several additional chains in the future.
This is fine with me. Everybody and every group of people is free to use their own set of consensus rules and fork the coin. But as long as the original coin is alive the forkcoin should not use the name of the original coin.
It's hard to believe someone with Cryddit's could-be-a-Satoshi level abilities would really not understand the diff between ~100% consensual forks and one predicated on a partially-faked "75%" (with 25% + NotXT spoofs strongly objecting).
As if the socioeconomic war of Gavincoin shorts vs longs will be over "within a day." As if MPEX will simply get bored after a few hours and abandon whatever battle plans for a protracted/expensive strategy of attrition he is doubtlessly currently devising.
If XT's fork is triggered it is not the end of the Great Schism, only the beginning of the hot phase.