Tsp asked me to rethink my opinion about the issue and I did.
My overall assessment of the situation is (boiled down):
- the issue is from the ancient (in internet terms) past
- there has been no other issue since
- there is no concrete proof, just assumptions and interpretations
- the circumstances under which QS dug up an old post as well as the behavior[2] after the rating was left, indirectly removed (BadBear removing QS from DT) and reinstated (TC adding QS) along the several[1] ratings make me question whether this is personal or not.
Yes, there are no rules regarding the DT List, but I would suggest to remove the rating or at the very least change it to neutral.
[1] @QS Im not sure whats wrong with that word, but you left 3 ratings, as QS, as ACCTSeller (now removed) and as FunFunnyFan.
[2] Both sides seem to be locked in some sort of vendetta now. This is does effect other threads and posts.
Yes you are right, there is no solid proof and even if it is, as dooglus said, it´s not really fraud? I mean after all quickseller was selling accounts with DT, which i would consider fraud.
He should change it to neutral and leave it like that.But no one can really force him to change his negative feedback, maybe
one day he will retract and change it to a neutral one or better delete it. No one remember this sentence : Trust system is not moderated.
However I don't think that tspacepilot is a 'bad' person and the
-ve trust is not necessary in my opinion (Negative - You
were scammed or you strongly believe that
this person is a scammer.) Maybe Quickseller thinks that tspacepilot IS a scammer, but I think he is wrong.
Normal trust may not be moderated but default trust is, in a way moderated and when someone abuses it they are kicked out, so it is moderated and he could be forced to change it in the future or forced indirectly if he gets kicked out of DT again