...
CIYAM's "specification" document is wrong as well as imprecise, ATs in themselves are not Turing complete and scarequotes won't make it so. The document, if it aspires to meet the requirements of a specification, should contain the precise details of the features ensuring Turing completeness of the programming language in which the ATs are expressed.
I can understand why people might want to distinguish sharply between ATs and a Turing complete scripting language.
Cheers
Graham
This is my sentiment as well. I'm probably going to split AT and Turing complete into two different rows on the next iteration.
I'll add a row for aliasing as well, and remove that from the unique features for Syscoin.
Also, sorry Sebastien256, missed that one. I'll add those NXT services next go-around as well.