Increase the BlockSize on Core.
It's obvious. We all want to increase the block size. Virtually no one disagrees about that. We have consensus!
But why doesn't it happen? Because the Core developers have invested 21 million dollars in BlockStream which requires small block sizes to maximize it's usefulness and profits. If you want to talk about a hostile takeover of Bitcoin, its' this TINY group of people who don't want to increase the block size vs the VAST MAJORITY of everyone else that wants to increase the Blocksize on Core.
The only reason XT is even in serious consideration, the only reason people are threatening to split bitcoin into two chains and go against consensus, is because the OBVIOUS SOLUTION to our problem is being stone walled by these developers who have more incentive for the success of BlockStream than they have incentive for the success of Bitcoin.
As the Core developers will not allow for a block size increase on Core, the only logical solution is to vote for XT. If you want to drop XT in it's tracks, support a block size increase on Core.
there is a thrid path
find some devs willing to fork Core yet again ( excetly how XT did it ) with increased block size and nothing else
then we let the miners and users decide which fork to run,
1)with block limit, Core
2)with minimal block limit increase, Core++
3)with block limit increase and loads of other changes we arent sure about, XT
Edit: fuck it man make like 3 different version of Core each one mines blocks with a different version number corresponding to the different proposed implementation of limit increase
feel free to fork this if you don't want it mikes name...