Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: DaDice.com - Next Gen Social Gambling Dice Experience | Progressive Jackpot
by
Quickseller
on 25/08/2015, 01:00:47 UTC
The problem here is that Dadice hadn't mentioned that rule at first (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996260.msg11994350#msg11994350), but suddenly came up with it last week when it had extended downtime (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=973765.msg12183171#msg12183171).

It is always a bad idea to change the rules of an on-going campaign, as it will for sure cause confusion and controversy.

My point exactly.

I could understand reaching out and crediting user who won with their "modified" timeframe, but changing stance and terms of their own OP .. not as much
Maybe the user who won with their modified timeframe was one of their shills. This is obviously speculation however it would match up with their other highly unethical and sketchy behavior