No. Categorically no. I am not now, nor have I ever been a GLBSE Actual owner. And when theymos' shares come on the market I have no plans at this time to become an owner, or shareholder in GLBSE Actual. I have no standing whatsoever to speak for GLBSE in any capacity. I was responding to facts of the timeline as I know them from personal experience, and trying to address your mis-characterization of those responses to someone else's question in furtherance of your own agenda.
Seriously? I totally had that impression too, from one of your previous posts. Oh, here it is.
Can you tell us what GLBSE owner challenged Nefario and can you please link us to his quote?
Yes, I was the GLBSE owner who challenged it
I hope you can understand why he, and I, and presumably a bunch of other people, thought that you were a shareholder in the exchange.
You are quite right, I should have qualified that with "GLBSE Fake", as I have started to do since that time. I was, for a very brief period of time a holder of a few shares of GLBSE Fake. They were all sold under the aegis of 1.0. I have never been, and will not ever be an owner or shareholder of GLBSE Actual or GLBSE Real. (Being the holding company and the eventual public release of shares in the market holding company.)