Based on the above,
- Have there been a 'control' check to see if there is a potential bug/exploit
- if we are saying many people should benefit from the dig, surely there should be a limit on clam clients on how many addresses they can dig, daily or over the lifetime
m2c
There is absolutely no reason to believe there is any exploit.
If there is an exploit; I highly doubt the user begins by applying it to CLAM, when there are so many juicy BTC out there to steal (It would almost certainly apply to BTC as well).
Again, a change to the "claim" process is highly unlikely; and not presently planned.
Ok, maybe i have not been clear enough & obviously not technical in this regard.
My query "Have there been a 'control' check to see if there is a potential bug/exploit" specifically for the dig process with clam client, BTC is not a proof-of-stake coin so i don't see the relevance.
- Due diligence is all that is asked