Re: Bitcoin XT - Officially #REKT (also goes for BIP101 fraud)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1144606.msg12250669#msg12250669
Blockstream, or its developers, never argued for permanent 1mb. I thought I taught you to shut your mouth when you were ignorant of facts?
Did you not read my post on your thread clearly highlighting the benefits of larger blocks for sidechains?
They stonewalled the increase for years (and continue to do) , same thing.
They want the 1mb to be in place for their lightening payment network.
For years?
Oh, not you Jonald! 
You do know sidechains are better with bigger block size limit, right? I don't know what else to say to you! Frankly, really disappointed!
* Edited.
You know, that the lightening payment network is not a sidechain, right?
People should really stop mixing things up ...
You know lightning network is not a Blockstream creation and open source?
What? Could we please focus on a subject?
jonald_fyookball made a statement about lightning. Muhammed Zakir countered with a statement about sidechains. Regardless of if these statements are true or not, they are talking about 2 different technologies.
You could have at least checked what was the discussion about? We were talking about Blockstream and Jonald used "they" and commected it to "lightning payment network" which is his mistake and not mine. But still, I should have corrected him, which is my mistake.
Is Blockstream not working on the Lightning network? Is this article wrong?OP, all I see from your graphic is Bitfury supports Bip 100.
But whatever, as long as we get bigger blocks and Blockstream
is cockblocked from keeping the 1mb in place, I'll be happy.
Don't really give a rat's ass one way or the other about XT.
But whatever, as long as we get bigger blocks and Blockstream
is cockblocked from keeping the 1mb in place, I'll be happy.
Don't really give a rat's ass one way or the other about XT.
Blockstream, or its developers, never argued for permanent 1mb. I thought I taught you to shut your mouth when you were ignorant of facts?
Did you not read my post on your thread clearly highlighting the benefits of larger blocks for sidechains?
They stonewalled the increase for years (and continue to do) , same thing.
They want the 1mb to be in place for their lightening payment network.
For years?
Oh, not you Jonald! You do know sidechains are better with bigger block size limit, right? I don't know what else to say to you! Frankly, really disappointed!
* Edited.
People should really stop mixing things up ...
You know lightning network is not a Blockstream creation and open source?
jonald_fyookball made a statement about lightning. Muhammed Zakir countered with a statement about sidechains. Regardless of if these statements are true or not, they are talking about 2 different technologies.
You could have at least checked what was the discussion about? We were talking about Blockstream and Jonald used "they" and commected it to "lightning payment network" which is his mistake and not mine. But still, I should have corrected him, which is my mistake.