A totalitarian power grab for the governance of Bitcoin. Not the proposition of a new implementation but an attempt a hijacking the consensus code behind political motives
From the other part of view we have a group of people that want to hijacking the consensus by
forcing users/market on going only on something new and untested (as lightening networks) and it is behind
financial motives.

I wonder who that would be

Are you trolls not tired of resorting to the ol' Blockstream boggeyman to justify your arguments?
Has it not been made clear enough that they stand to lose absolutely nothing by increasing the block size?
I know disingenuity is par for the course for XT supporters but don't you have anything better than conjecture and ignorance to back up your position?