Aaaaand how Core devs ignoring a large group of the market asking for scalability solution in a timely manner is not totalitarianism?
Blocks aren't full now, why do you need a TEMPORARY solution now when the problem doesn't yet exist? And larger block sizes aren't a sustainable long term scalability solution.
So you are saying that reactionary solutions are to be preferred over pro-active solutions? Can you give me an example?
Larger blocks address near term limitations imposed solely by the arbitrary 1mb limit. There are other scalability issues that bitcoin will face on its way to wider acceptance and use, but to be honest, we cant make plans for 5 billion users when we barely have 3 transaction per second right now.
