Clearly there is more than enough evidence at this point . . .
Then perhaps we should move our complaints to a more aggressive medium. If you believe that scrypt.cc should be taken down, bring your "Facts" to the FCC in the USA, or for any other country, your local communications regulators, and prove your case why it should not exist. Might not be able to get your money or santos, but at least you can go after the site.
That is if you are at all serious about "Taking them down," LOL, i have my suspicions on that topic...
FCC YOU wont do anything, and therefore the FCC won't either...
1. The evidence has already been collected. Just because you're new here doesn't mean we all are. Go read this thread. The evidence, fact-based evidence is there. You're either too lazy to read or too stupid to know what I'm saying, I don't care which. Maybe you can prove its just laziness by reviewing the facts that have been posted here. I did actual research to find the chain from Enom to NameCheap to CloudFlare to PhoenixNAP. Those are facts, facts than can be used as you've asked. Please, try to refute that. I welcome the chance to laugh at you again.
2. Why on Earth are you talking about the FCC? The Federal Communications Commission? This is investment fraud... which is why I mentioned the SEC.
For someone who wants to be scientific and factual and look at hard evidence, you're pretty subjective and stupid.
EDIT: and now you're resorting to the
classic line of the Ponzi Queens who continue to defend their scam, "never invest more than you can afford to lose." While that's sound investment advice, it's not a defense for knowingly participating in a scam.