i do take a stance on both sides as i see both are in grievous error of each other.
Great, that's really helpful. People here have to weed through your horribly written overly-lengthy posts and try to figure out which side you're rooting for at any given moment. Way to let your bi-polar nature play out in the investment world.
scrypt.cc has one too many problems and should shut down until it can fix its service and provide the evidence everyone suggests. But to claim he is a scammer because there are legitimate problems and all known transactions are being posted through, they are simply taking enormous lengths of time, it is just unthinkable. When sony had is psn "hack" in 2011 there never was a group that took responsibility for it. It was a mess as big as this one, and no one ever actually found out because there was nothing but a flame war.
If your evidence is so solid then he is still in business against all other odds. But he definitely isn't saying what is and therefore anything that you say is, isn't necessarily the correct answer.
and your account is a measly 11 months older than mine congrats, you missed the 1 year mark...it'll never happen again...
Not only am I not sure what that means but an acct from April 2014 is a bit older than one from March of this year. 11 months is several lifetimes in crypto and I guarantee you I've been involved in a meaningful way with more crypto projects than you could dream of. One thing that's abundantly clear is that you have a fundamental lack of understanding of the entire crypto ecosystem and not just this particular scam.
You keep ranting, ranting, ranting about wanting evidence... how about you STFU and go find some of your own and post it here. You obviously don't like the
facts that have been posted to date so go be a detective little Kenny, and report back.