First of all, gambling is gambling. Some days you're lucky, other days you're not, some days you win, others you lose. That's how gambling works. Today, you just had some bad luck and lost. Get over it.
Secondly, PRC and safedice uses an almost identical provably fair method. From PRC:
You are completely missing the point... why is this so hard to understand? PRC predetermines your bets based off your account only. Safedice will predetermine your bets based on IP< so if you are betting on more than one account at a time, it will predetermine bets based off your IP, so your probabilities and bets won't line up how you would expect them too.
Why is this so hard to understand? 20 bots running for a month with maybe 1 busting each week vs. 5 bots running for 30 minutes having 2 bust. Regardless of whether you can lose, I shouldn't have lost so quickly from the base bet I was using.
I'm not questioning the provably fair, I'm questioning how the site interprets your rolls. I knew this was the case so I'm stupid for trying to recover a measily .2 loss that turned into a 2 btc loss, but running more than one bot on safedice FUCKED ME and it pisses me off cause its just some programming discrepancy and my lack of self control.
Why is this so hard to understand?
You clearly don't understand how the provably fair algorithms work. Each account has its own server seed, its own client seed, and its own nonce, which means it predetermines the rolls based solely on each account, exactly like PRC. You can check your rolls to verify this if you don't believe me. Whether you played on one IP or on 300, it wouldn't have made a difference to your rolls. Why is that so hard to understand?
There's no "Shouldn't have" in gambling other than "I shouldn't have gambled". It's chance, anything can happen. Why is this so hard to understand?
Edit: And there I went and got myself involved again... *sigh*