Hi guys
Reading the OP now like 10 times, but have to ask what it is in here that cost 4000 BTC to develop, or even 800 BTC as you so kindly can do with ?
Many coins already claimed or have many of the ideas so once again what takes 4000 BTC to develop here..
THIS is no FUD I might invest in it if I get good answers, but for me this is like draining the market for things that can be develop for much less money. please correct me with good information.
Hi flubber and thank you for the question. It's been brought up multiple times and we have answered it, but at 32 pages now, some posts have gotten buried in the thread.
Please see these 2 posts I've made to help answer your question.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1141617.msg12276783#msg12276783https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1141617.msg12228712#msg12228712I'm not sure what other coins have "claimed" to have made or not, but what we have outlined in the ANN is what has already been completed in the core code. Those things listed on the roadmap are features for us to continue coding and testing prior to their potential addition to the core code in the future.
stoner19: as an investor, I have to ask myself what I get from my investment, so far as I look at it I don't want overpayed work or lambos for the crew for my money. If I hire a dev or a team of devs, I pay for the work and code I get back, a working solution right ? , so then why do I need a whole team on a payroll, to just sit and watch the working code I already payed for, don't get my wrong and I do hope it work, but I would never pay people to just sit and watch all day and then report back, "yes sir it works today also."
That's why I think the claim for so much BTC must have a much better specific budget, so investors can relax and get what they pay for