I really do want to hear satan's remarks on my thinking pattern of this scam.

I perhaps don't know what more of a definition i need to be told, but seems he doesn't need a definition to be constant. If a ponzi is a scam in which money from investors is payed to other investors, and this site has the potential to keep all investments, I'm still gonna say that greed is a bigger manipulator than need, and santos at first mighta needed suckers, but now he's just geeding them...

If any body has an answer that makes greed less desirable than need in this case, im open to suggestions.

But the devil like my dad:

Prolly shouldn't try to mess with A real demon Grandpa...

not derailing it proving it, and you need correction therapy...

also ima point out that the first couple paragraphs int no poof = poof of none in you sig is honestly full of shit. Play any game long enough and you win. I bought into Scrypt.cc in may and was out by july with substantial profit. If it is so hard for late comers to profit, then i'm an exception to your rules.

And that means that if scrypt.cc is a ponzi, then i have won all of your coins, and if you have not invested then you hold no stake. Still gonna say the site is full of shit, but why not keep all of those shiny btc to himself and give back what he currently is???