First, you edited my OP and broke all of the links changing .org to .com.
Then you sent me a PM asking if it would be ok to move this thread to Service Discussion. WTF? If discussion of the Foundation isn't a good topic for the main Discussion forum what is?
Then you sent me a PM asking if it would be ok to move this thread to Service Discussion. WTF? If discussion of the Foundation isn't a good topic for the main Discussion forum what is?
Woah. That is a significant abuse of moderator power.
Has hazek edited any of your other posts?
Has hazek edited any of my posts?
Has hazek edited any of satoshi's old posts?
Editing another's posts is far worse than deletion, when it comes to abuse of moderator powers. That is misrepresenting someone else's identity.
Edit: Yes, Gavin should have signed his post with PGP, to more easily spot things like this.
Maybe you should read someone's replies to accusations before judging people?
It seems that hazek's intentions were good, whereas Gavin is simply spreading FUD by selectively pulling things out of context.
But it's nice to see that you realise the danger when people have the power to influence things you trust on in daily life. I assume that with this new found knowledge you better understand the criticism on the foundation-gang.
But hey, maybe the foundation can set up their own forums, where they can moderate-away any opinions they don't like and ensure that *their* vision on bitcoin (which is the most important one in their eyes) gets spread undisturbed...