1 BTC is much more than he is accused of stealing from coinchat. Why would he steal dust from coinchat but not steal a whole Bitcoin from me?
There are a good number of people who create new accounts to scam in the lending and currency exchange sections. I am not yet an expert of reading minds, but something tells me they do this to avoid having their primary identities revealed as being a scammer.
I don't understand your point. Are you saying tsp is someone's secondary identity? I've never seen him in the lending section.
I am saying that the offense where which tsp had stolen money involved tsp's identity not being known at the time of the offense. From what I have reviewed, it was only until some kind of an investigation (maybe into IP evidence?) that it was discovered that tsp was the one who was stealing money via bots.
If someone thinks they can hide their identity being associated with a scam they will pull off, then the threshold for how much money they would need to be able to take given the chance to scam will be less then if your identity would be clearly associated with a scam.
You should review this
thread. Scammer/troll
Candystripees had created a brand new account to try to extort some amount of money from someone and clearly did not believe his "Candystripes" identity would be associated with this extortion. It was only until later, after
BadBear conducted an investigation that the two were linked together. I have been told by someone who was familiar with the matter that Candystripes had tried to extort somewhere in the range of .2 BTC, and I am also aware of this
thread in which Candystripes returned ~.21 BTC to someone who overpaid him.
Or maybe because he knew that he had no choice except to return the money, or thought that you would not process any withdrawal request as long as he owed you money.
He did have a choice. He could have withdrawn the money, or he could have returned it. He chose to return it.
I gave him no reason to suspect that I wouldn't honor any withdrawal request. Nobody has ever complained of being unable to withdraw from Just-Dice.
There has been at least one
instance that resulted in someone being unable to withdraw money from Just-Dice when they were in possession of money that was not rightfully theirs.
He won a bunch of CLAMs and I froze his account. I challenged him about his scamming. He claimed twice to have no connection to KingDice, but finally admitted that he was the same person.
Do you really think it would be unreasonable that someone receiving a
reputation loan would not have their account frozen until they repaid such loan, especially considering that there is precedent to freezing such accounts?
How much interest exactly did you earn from this loan?