No. I will not sugarcoat these ideas because they are dangerous.
Making decisions on the security of a billion $ network based on targeting a certain transaction fee is the definition of "fucktarded"
BIP100 is less fucktardalishous?
No, I'm increasingly getting the sense that BIP100 is equally broken. Having miners decide on the blocksize makes no sense from a game-theory point of view. The block size is there to put a check on their ambition.
i agree BIP100 and this idea are on about the same level of crazy.