I think it would be more strategic to go the other way. Present this now,
let everyone freak out about "no limit Bitcoin" and then Bip 101 will seem
more reasonable by comparison (to those that believe we need a limit
or the sky will fall).
I half agree. But my worry is that without a more convincing presentation, it won't be taken seriously (i.e., it won't cause "everyone freak out about 'no limit Bitcoin.'")
Yes it needs more meat.
A list of considerations and objections would need to be compiled and then addressed.
Also a few more paragraphs could be added about the nature of consensus and the
current difficulties. What got me started on this thread was the thought that "hey wait a sec,
everyone had consensus on what Bitcoin is and does, but now we can't
agree because of some stupid technical detail."