Re: Quickseller backpedals, then continues trust abuse without evidence
Did I miss any questions that need answering? I skipped a bunch of your long-winded post.
If you usually freeze funds until you investigate scams, then why would TSP expect anything other then you to freeze his account until you investigate if he has repaid you or not 
I have no reason to suspect tsp of being a scammer, and so didn't feel any need to freeze his funds.
I have also yet to see any evidence that TSP had actually received the loan that you both have claimed that was made, only that it was repaid 
I posted a screenshot of my tip to him here.
Does me being QS (if true) make any of my points any less valid? I intentionally did not initially give any opinions in this thread out of fear of being flamed (I did give my opinion after being flamed by TSP), and I only asked questions that were previously ignored. Do you think my questions should continue to be ignored regardless of who I am or am not?
I think a valid question is a valid question whoever asks it. But it's hard sometimes to pull valid questions from the surrounding noise.
Almost everyone in this thread was accused of being $username that (correctly) agreed that TSP is a scammer. It appears that TSP's ways have not changed in this thread. Does this have anything to do with the number of people opposing TSP in this thread?
I don't know.