I cashed out more than he wanted from his site which gives out free bitcoins for chatting.
I don't see how it could be any more clear that he received money that he should not have......would a signed confession be enough? How about an admission in open court?
I don't read that as he received money he
should not have. I read that as he received more than the site owner wanted him to. You could say the same about any gambling site - that doesn't mean the person cheated or scammed.
I would read that as him cashing out more then what he should have. His quote implies that he was sent some amount of money in error (and has refused to return it).
tspacepilot admitted to being given an amount that was claimed he needed to repay:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=303613.msg3250689#msg3250689He said I owed him 0.2BTC if I wanted to be reinstated on coinchat.
There is precedent for people to be labeled as scammers when they receive money in error.....KoS comes to mind when describing this kind of situation. Although both situations are BS (IMO), I would personally buy KoS's explanation (that the received BTC was a "tip" for busting scams -- and that he cashed out of the BTC in error, ended up in the hospital almost right after receiving he BTC, then the price skyrocketed, and "offered" to repay the fiat value), then tspacepilots explications (that what happened at coinchat has nothing to do with bitcointalk.org marketplace trust).