So who's winning, red or blue? I can't tell you guys apart anymore for all the name-calling and tantrums.

Ah yes, yet another poster more
concerned with process objections (zomg someone is being rude on the internet) than technical details about scaling Bitcoin.
That's the opposite of what I was saying. This thread, like pretty much all others on the issue, has completely ditched any actual technical discussion in favour of the usual primate shit-slinging as far as I can tell. It's coming from both "sides", if you can call them that, since the only difference seems to be that both hate each other's guts.
What's a Gavinista? I'd like a technical breakdown of the term so I can see if I'm one.
There you go again, with your process objection meta. I'll fetch your fainting couch because in an unprecedented outbreak of ill manners, several Bitcoiners (having uncharacteristically strong opinions) have expressed themselves vehemently!
Gavinista is a play on Sandinista, a Marxist variant of the Free Shit Army that came to power in a putsch comparable to Gavin's takeover bid.
As you sympathize with Death&Taxes'
long-debunked Chicken Little panic over lack of more ~free tx, the Gavinista label applies.
I don't hate Frap.doc's guts, I'm just disappointed (albeit amused) he wound up on the wrong side of history but is too stubborn to admit being wrong.
As we consider the friendships and fortunes destroyed by the Bitcoin Civil War, let's remember it was Hearn who decided it best to force the governance issue Right Fucking Now, using
overhyped block size FUD to incite the mob against their superiors, for the benefit of his junta.
As for "primate shit-slinging," yes we are going to rub the Gavinistas' faces in the steaming pile of poo XT represents. There are consequences when you attack (with fully malicious intent) a multi-year multi-billion-dollar socioeconomic consensus and quickly destroy 20% of its market value.
These examples of
what happens when you attack Bitcoin need to be publicized, so that next time someone considers attacking Bitcoin with their vanity fork, they may account for such precedents in their decision.