I know right. After all this time. Well you know what they say in crypto that if the roi is way shorter than the competition then its too good to be true 
The "roi" is set by what people are willing to pay for the MHS (was KHS) being sold. That has nothing to do with scrypt.cc being a scam or not. The prices are very low per MHS because the yield is very low. It was set to 20% after the hack and never restored. Prices just adjusted to the lower return. It is a free market. That is all.
If the yield goes down the ROI point should be further away, no?
It's funny how you casually mention "mining" in this context even though it has nothing to do with scrypt.cc. You aren't trying to pass some kind of subliminal message implying that scrypt.cc is mining, are you?
By the way when LTC profitability jumped up recently what happened to scrypt.cc rewards? Right.
As for "market" - of course it's controlled by scrypt.cc because:
1) scrypt.cc controls the rewards - obviously.
2) scrypt.cc controls the supply by making their own MHS out of thin air and stealing customers' MHS (the 37000 issue not even acknowledged by the admin).
3) scrypt.cc controls the demand by meddling with withdrawals and auto-invest.