Thats because I have the right to live and nothing should overturn a right, otherwise it becomes a privilege. I'm unaware of any such right to the disclosure of alt accounts. I understand your point completely, you seem to think QS has commited some kind of fraud by not disclosing the account, I don't agree with you. Scams aren't moderated here, buyers need to be careful, they are the ones responsible to find this kind of trickery.
You are saying that it is completely fine to escrow for self
Which one is it that you are confused about?
1. Escrows are independent third-parties. You do know what third party is?
2. An omission of a material fact for personal benefit is fraud.
3. Libel is a published false statement that is damaging to a person's reputation.
Also, your argument is awkward because you are saying buyers need to be careful of getting scammed. I agree. Scams aren't moderated here. I agree. But, Do scammers deserve negative trust? Yes, they do. is a continuation of that. (Not saying QS is scammer here. Just saying you missed this. Scammers are responsible and will be accused. Technically, you are using Caveat Emptor without considering the exemptions inter alia fraud.
)1. A type of car insurance. /s
2. Where is the personal benefit? While he "could" have scammed, he didn't actually.
3. DaDice scammed me = libel
I think DaDice are scammers = opinion
2. Where is the personal benefit? While he "could" have scammed, he didn't actually.
3. DaDice scammed me = libel
I think DaDice are scammers = opinion
1. At least you accepted this.
2. Fee, trust feedback. (and your point. Also, it is shady, and I highly doubt if this is true and actually proved, QS will remain in default trust)
3.IMO both are opinions if that is all an ordinary person says. But when QS, being supposedly a trusted member of the community, asserts "Da Dice is scam" in multiple threads, posts and trust feedbacks that is called libel.
Cheers
ndnhc
P.S. Last post for today.