I'd say that it's the other way around. Take a look at the reason QS gave tspacepilot the negative rating, it's quite obvious that QS was looking for a reason to give him a negative rating and he dug out a very petty incident, he had nothing to do with and held zero proof about. Also from years ago. After being called out and even temporarily removed from default trust after a lot of controversy had concentrated in a small period of time QS still refused to revise the rating out of spite. Do you still think that tspacepilot harassed quickseller?
Timeline:March 3, 2015:The escrow for TSP"s signature campaign posts a
GPG signed message claiming to be in possession of 8 BTC. TSP continued his participation of this signature campaign without incident
Over 30 days pass!April 9, 2015:TSP
trollsQS on a signature campaign thread about signing a bitcoin message from the bitcoin address he claimed to be holding money in. QS had previously signed a PGP message saying almost the exact same information as the message in the signature campaign TSP was participating in.
Over 11 days pass!April 20, 2015:TSP opens a thread in Meta
complaining that QS was engaging in trust abuse. It appears that QS had removed the negative trust rating and then put it back on, so I am not quite sure as to what date it was originally put on, however I have no reason to believe it was any date other then this same date.
I think yes, TSP was the one harassing QS, not the other way around. It was going on for over a week and a half before QS found something on TSP. If the trust rating was really something petty, don't you think he would have added it sooner rather then after more then a week?
I have seen a lot of people troll QS (yourself included) that never receive any kind of negative trust from QS. I don't think you like QS, do you? Has QS ever given you any kind of negative rating? I don't think you would like it if I started to harass you for over a week after you did nothing to me (don't worry, I am not going to do this), so why would you think QS would be any different?
Even if you did not believe that TSP was harassing QS (even though I just proved that he was), then how would you explain TSP's harassment towards me? I had posted in TSP's meta thread at September 02, 2015, 10:43:41 PM and TSP responded on September 02, 2015, 11:33:07 PM, only 50 minutes later(!) claiming that I am QS. Do you really think that TSP was able to do all this research in only 50 minutes? To add insult to injury, TSP is not even sure that he is right about me and QS being the same person.
If you want to deny that panthers52 is your alt, you should go ahead and deny it (I'm guessing you don't want to do this because you can already foresee the day when you're going to have to own up to it, like you eventually did with ACCTSeller).
There is also the issue of why TSP asked me to post in his meta thread in the first place. I received this
unsolicited personal message from TSP around two weeks ago:
[...]
So, again, perhaps you'll delete your post or recraft your reply to be about the topic at hand. I really think that I have to defend myself if you're going to attack me, but I don't see how it's helpful for anyone for us to do this in this thread. If you want to join the discussion surrounding QS' personal war on me, maybe you could do it in the Meta thread about that topic:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1129059.0Why do you think TSP asked me to post in his meta thread, and only two weeks later accused me of being QS, and accused QS of what he claims QS did?