Do you think it is fair that I should have to risk my money on the potential that someone else will run away while acting as escrow, when I have built up my own reputation to a level in which others are willing to risk their money on me, if I want to protect my own identity? ...
There is no reason why I should have to risk my money like that just so I can protect my privacy.
I struggle with QS's syntax, but this seems to me like a confirmation and attempted justification of acting as an escrow in deals in which he was one of the principles. Am I reading this correctly?
Yup you got it right, I gonna take a archive of this, so that later QS doesn't claim his account was hacked or anything, he is acting weird this days, maybe anger does this to people.