Anyway, apologies if this has discussion has been heated at times. Despite that, it's been educational and ended on a positive note!
No worries from me, I've pretty thick skin. I may have offended and that wasn't my intent either.
The situation at scrypt.cc is very stressful, even as it is improving. It causes a lot of heated debate.
All anyone needs to do is look here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=220936 if they want to know whether or not to trust what you're saying.
You bounce from Ponzi to Ponzi, scam to scam, and do your best to promote them to entice others. BTC-Arbs, Bitcoin-trader(dot)biz, Paycoin... all scams you promoted heavily in the face of evidence to the contrary:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=557446.msg6080055#msg6080055https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=857670.msg11129345#msg11129345https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=444495.msg11120912#msg11120912It's sad that this is your involvement in the crypto community. No amount of semantics, word games, and dissection of pointless minutia will change that this is a giant scam based on a lie. It doesn't matter that you've been involved since Feb 2014, and you're now trying to debate the specific figure of how much fictitious hash is being sold. The point is, its all fake, and its all a lie, and you're promoting a scam.
Your negative trustrating is inappropriate.
He is just blatantly wrong with his assessments. To be wrong is no crime.
I have perceived him as very friendly over the forums.