I'm just gonna drop this here
https://botbot.me/freenode/bitcoin-wizards/2015-08-30/?msg=48477664&page=1It's infuriating when someone makes an intellectually weak argument, but slateers it in so much (very nicely constructed) pretext and trappings that people who aren't interested or lack the context to evaluate it on its merits are too busy being mesmorized with the leather binding.

Which paper of Peter's is Greg referring to?
I thought Peter is now arguing we don't need any block limit for a "healthy fee market".
Is this a different paper?
No, it is referring to the same paper.
If you want to understand the assumptions that make any of what Peter has posted here wrong I suggest you read the above.
Sometimes it is nice to have two sides of the story.