1. This isn't a forum for BTCJam. If investors on that platform wanted to fund a loan for gambling, that's on them.

2. The facts in evidence aren't opinions. I'm not angry because dysak doesn't agree with me, I'm frustrated because he's ignoring facts and trying to defend Marcelo's practices. The fractional mining nonsense is a distraction, as is any talk about Paycoin or LTCGear or anything not ScryptCC.  Right now I don't see a need to be tolerant of anyone claiming ScryptCC is mining at all, without any proof of mining. This isn't about feelings and opinions, it's about numbers. And dysak's numbers come from his mind and his mind only, vs publicly available numbers that prove ScryptCC isn't mining. Many of you seem to be blind to the fact that the dysak show has taken focus away from the core problem. If I stop posting will ScryptCC become less of a scam? If I give credibility to this "fractional mining" bullshit will all those people who didn't get their withdrawals suddenly get them? If I remove my negative rating from dysak's profile will Marcelo suddenly be able to prove he's mining?

I will once again state I will stop posting here if dysak can disprove my claims and put the focus back where it needs to be, namely that

PSA: scrypt.cc is a scam, most likely of the "ponzi" variety. You will lose your money if you try to "invest" or "play" or whatever you want to call your participation in this shitshow. You've been warned.

More info here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1102560.0