There's no other definition for atheism other than "disbelief in God".
I understand however, and we often come to a clash with what I call "American Atheism", AA's seams to imply some oddities to Atheism, such as same sex marriage, abortion, gay rights and a whole load of dogmatic crap that is alien to Atheism, basically they want to input a sort of leftist view or "caviar-leftism" to Atheism.
Doctrines are bad by definition, because ANY course of action can be either good or bad based upon its context. Doctrine and dogmatic views always follow irrational responses by ignoring this factor.
In other words what's good for me may not be good for you and vice-versa, and what may be good today may be bad tomorrow.
And please! Stop with "falsehoods" and "Messiahs"! That sounds so irrational! Specially taken that you're talking of a religion made by Romans some 100 years after the supposed Jesus existed, if he ever did.
I understand however, and we often come to a clash with what I call "American Atheism", AA's seams to imply some oddities to Atheism, such as same sex marriage, abortion, gay rights and a whole load of dogmatic crap that is alien to Atheism, basically they want to input a sort of leftist view or "caviar-leftism" to Atheism.
Doctrines are bad by definition, because ANY course of action can be either good or bad based upon its context. Doctrine and dogmatic views always follow irrational responses by ignoring this factor.
In other words what's good for me may not be good for you and vice-versa, and what may be good today may be bad tomorrow.
And please! Stop with "falsehoods" and "Messiahs"! That sounds so irrational! Specially taken that you're talking of a religion made by Romans some 100 years after the supposed Jesus existed, if he ever did.
Often people say something like, "I don't (or can't) believe it." Other time they say, "I believe it."
Since atheism has been proven false - because it has been scientifically proven that God exists - how can we keep from talking about falsehoods when the topic is about an activity of atheism?
In addition, isn't the person who brings the clarity about the falsehood of atheism to the atheists to show them the truth... isn't that person a messiah of sorts, one that is trying to bring the truth to light?
Sounds to me that taking the focus off faith in Christianity (which might be true), and placing it on atheism (which has been proven false in more ways than one), is an attempt to cover up the truth. And if someone wants to cover up the truth, what is the use of a thread that is looking for the truth in truthful answers, like this one?
Why are you trying to hide the truth?
