Why the double standard?
Tomatocage did the same thing with his alt extraKrispy but he has seen as one of the most trustworthy people here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=793183.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=257307
I'm not saying I don't trust tomatocage but what's the deal with double standards and witch hunts?
Tomatocage did the same thing with his alt extraKrispy but he has seen as one of the most trustworthy people here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=793183.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=257307
I'm not saying I don't trust tomatocage but what's the deal with double standards and witch hunts?
Well, Krispy really is an actual person, though I admit I probably (accidentally) posted from his account as much as he actually did. Dude is a co-worker who was having some bad luck, so I rented out my guest room to him. Those coins that I escrowed for mysel.. oops I mean Krispy really were his coins though. Very convenient explanation, right? I wish it made for a more exciting story, but that's pretty much all there was to it.
Not the response I was expecting..
Even if your story is believable (
), you are still controlling all parts of the trade in terms of extraKrispy's side and escrow side. The middleman is supposed to be a third party. You may have been doing it on his behalf, but you are still in control of the coins and trade.