I am not going to be following the discussion in this thread at this time. Any who continue to make more false and myopic statements, that doesn't mean you are correct.
You realise you sound like John Connor?
I am not selling anything. There is no coin yet. VNL is a coin that is already on the market. In the opening post of the thread I created, it clearly states that I would not be discussing the consensus design at this time, and that the purpose of making a thread now was to get a vote on the naming and to show some code to prove I am real and to potentially solicit some other developers to help.
I apologize if I am I following what I wrote in my opening post. I should apologize for trying to maintain consistency between what I write and what I do.
You of course are welcome to discuss consensus designs and delegation in your own threads. I just won't be participating further at this time. I will soon when my implementation has reached the point where I can publish the white paper.
Again no personal offense intended. Carry on without me.
Why can't we have mutual respect? Am I a God to ask that I can be consistent? Come on stop acting like 5 year olds. We are more mature than that.