However, I don't think it is trust abuse, within the context of the cryptocurrency marketplace. Hype of vaporware and conveniently selective disclosure of information is something that has been used by scammers and has a high risk of being employed by someone who is scamming.
Smooth you live in a fantasy world. You know damn well I am not hyping vaporware because you've even seen the Blake2 hash I coded in Scala this past week.
And you completely ignore the point that I made about when factoring in the probability of a scam, you must factor in the 2.5 years of reputation of Anonymint. Would Anonymint sacrifice his reputation? What is the probability of that.
You have disappointed me smooth. But that is okay because it was already clear from too many numerous past conversations that you have selective reading myopia weakness.
Smoothie abused the Trust rating system which is supposed to be for bad trades
This is not quite right and is a common misconception. The instructions on the trust page say:
Negative - You were scammed or you strongly believe that this person is a scammer
The scamming is supposed to be relative to
BTC value, as the form asks for the
BTC value involved.
If this devolves to a judgement of personality, then it is a meaningless metric. Surely you are smart enough to see that and I shouldn't have to explain that to you.
And again there is no strong evidence presented that I am a scammer. Taking into account the reputation history on my signature line prevents any argument that there is a high likelihood I am a scammer. He tried to abuse the system because he thought he could use his Legendary reputation against my newbie status, but my signature line points to one Hero account from 2013 and several other accounts with significant status.