+111111111111
Gavin
Keep moving forward. You are doing a fantastic job. Don't get sidetracked by a few critics. Most people here support you and even if not , they can create their own foundation or club.
Sidetracked ? You are not listening to the critics at all man. You simply don't get it.
I think that the
foundation is good and important thing, but why not
fix some bugs while the thing is small. After the foundation grows big, it will be more difficult to make important changes.
Here is the list of bugs to be (potentially) fixed:
1. The name "The Bitcoin Foundation" wrongly suggest that it is the central authority that controls Bitcoin.
2.
The hosting company of the BitcoinFoundation.org is (with high probability) a Government-run honeypot.3. There is no safe way for people to have a vote in the Foundation without giving up their identities (which could prove fatal in case of Bitcoin users are declared terrorists, or government tries to confiscate Bitcoins from them).
4. Lack of clear privacy policy. No mention about security of member's personal data (are the servers encrypted or whatever).
6. The organization is not for profit which means it can't go bankrupt should it provide a crappy service as long as big businesses are prepared to open their purse they can operate indefinitely. (a scary thought)
7.
The foundation servers are in US, making it trivial for FED & law enforcement to raid them & gather all TBF member data.(
optional) - The CEO of MtGox (with all the problems with anonymity, taint listing, AML shit, KYC shit and arbitrary account freezing in this exchanger) is a founder.
(
optional) - The lead dev who owns the git access and is a founding member and a member of the board of directors for the next two years is a conflict of interest.
Not listening to critics is not a good thing. It's like dictatorial stance "we don't give a fuck about what you think, we will do what we want".I also know that Gavin probably has me on his
ignore list, because he never answers any of my posts directed at him, which is also not very nice.
If Gavin does not want (or does not have time, he is lead dev after all) to answer our criticism, he should at least delegate somebody to "scan" the forums to check what people's opinions are, and then answer them collectively on a blog or something.