Let's get one thing straight, you are the one repeating themselves over and over, not me.
There was a drop.
May 14 2015 39,268 -5.30% 1,124 GH/s
May 10 2015 41,466 6.91% 1,187 GH/s
You don't have any proof that drop wasn't caused by scypt.cc. The only thing we can say for sure is that there wasn't anywhere near 850 GHs removed from the LTC network. There have a few bigger hits too, so this isn't proof that the drop was from scrypt.cc, the timing just lines up. At the time fast average dropped like a rock. The real problem isn't the hit, it is the speed of the recovery. The hit timing match up but the recovery was quicker than it should have been. At the time the hit was very visible on the 504 average.
Additionally scrypt.cc has always claimed the they mostly mine other alt coins besides LTC. So we don't have real proof either way and there multiple things that could have happen that would have produced the same results.
So all we have is a lack of proof of 850 GHs. Maybe we have proof of a smaller amount, I do agree it isn't great proof.
You posted some numbers without explanation or source. Is that supposed to show "a drop"? Because it doesn't.
What you need to do is post the dates when the move was happening and show us the block time averages for that period and how that compares to the timings before and after the move. Bonus points if you can show that the shortfall came from one pool or from the "Unknown" part of the network.
Can you do that?
And you completely ignored the technical feasibility of such move, as usual.
PSA: scrypt.cc is a scam, most likely of the "ponzi" variety. You will lose your money if you try to "invest" or "play" or whatever you want to call your participation in this shitshow. You've been warned.More info here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1102560.0 Case in point! Repeating things over and over like a 3 year old. What happen to free speech and the right to express your views? What happened to the right to have a discussion about what is going on?
It isn't that you don't have a right to call scrypt.cc a scam, you do. However the way you do it is trolling and effectivity stomps on the rights of others, even people that agree with you.
Me exercising my freedom of speech does not prevent you from exercising yours. However you're the one here whining that you somehow don't get a fair shake while at the same time posting made up "arguments" as to how scrypt.cc is anything but a ponzi. From where I'm standing your rights are fine, it's your facts that are lacking.