LaudaM against LaudaM:
"Yet with a flawed paper you've managed to gather a group of 'followers' around here."
"Honestly I do not have time to asses your paper, nor am I that interested in it (in general)."
Makes not much sense to discuss with people like that.
Anything else you would like to add to this personal attack? I didn't review his paper, others did.
I never said that I would not discuss it based on the opinions/reviews of others. With (in general) I mean papers related to the fee market. I do not have time to read that. If you are not going to contribute properly, do not contribute at all. Anyone who does this next will be permanently ignored as well. I shall not waste my time with such people.
Instead of "Peter Todd is wrong because of XXX" you go for "let's attack Lauda because of XYZ". This bring us back to:
The level of hostile emotional appeal and logical fallacy in this thread is astounding.
Update: The said user was put on ignore because of zero value posts, attacks and trolling.