I've always been certain Szabo is Satoshi but even more convinced after hearing the pod-cast. He seems to go out of his way to refer to Satoshi in the third person. Also the fact that no-one really knows much about Szabo shows that here is an individual who is very careful about protecting his identity. I think also that Andreas knows that he is Satoshi - he's almost referential is his questions to Szabo.
Well..no.
Satoshi's white paper propose a solution for small
casual transaction, just read his introduction.
If Szabo is Satoshi then he changed his mind.
Yeah, I thought this was interesting too. I tend to fall in the Szabo is Satoshi camp but Szabo is really clear lately that a main goal wasn't small transactions which seems to be at odds with Satoshi's vision. So I agree he would have had to change his mind. Another possibilty could be Satoshi was Szabo and several other people, and the others disagreed on that point.

There is reason why the Genesis Block mentions a second round of bank bailouts instead of, oh say, debit/credit surcharges for small purchases at Starbucks.
Satoshi created Bitcoin to stop command economy BS like bank bailouts, not because he was charged fifty cents extra for using his AMEX to buy a latte.
Uppercase-B Bitcoin (or lowercase in Szabo notation)
the first viable and most secure ecash competes with gold and central banks.
Lowercase-b bitcoin (or uppercase in Szabo notation)
the blockchain technology competes with Visa/Paypal/Square (via altcoins).
Bitcoin is global revolution against authoritarianism, not the next fucking Dwolla.
"Aug. 5, 2010: While I dont think
is practical for smaller micropayments right now, it will eventually be as storage and bandwidth costs continue to fall.
Whatever size micropayments you need will eventually be practical. I think in 5 or 10 years, the bandwidth and storage will seem trivial."
I don't think Satoshi was as binary as you'd wish him to be.