I read all kinds of books, as long as they are educational; you cannot seriously evaluate a book or idea until you have read it.

My favorite books take into account the recorded evidence that supports the survival hypothesis. You cannot be an atheist if you accept the survival hypothesis because that hypothesis refutes humanism, and all atheists are humanists (since what else could they be?). Therefore, I am asking atheists to give an alternative account of the evidence that supports the survival hypothesis (52 points linked below); maybe I missed something in my reading.

So, before I get into why my favorite books are valid truth, I would first ask atheists to examine their beliefs in light of the evidence that supports the survival hypothesis. Please do not hate me for bringing you this information; it is merely a scientific hypothesis.
www.near-death.com/evidence.html