Respectively, anyone that has access to scrypt.cc has a great deal more than $.25 invested in that access.
I thought your issue was that the amounts involved now were insignificant (I disagreed). If that isn't, in fact, your view then I apologise for misinterpreting your original post.That isn't a first world issue.
Well, my argument was that this affects people outside the First World. I'm not sure I'd go as far as saying this isn't a First World issue - there are people in my city where 25c is a lot of money (I live in the UK, where the main opposition party has just elected a leader on an anti-austerity ticket. I suspect my city is worse off than many UK cities, but poverty is increasing in the UK).Sure kids haven't paid anything, but someone has paid for them. All the time I hear about people mining with "free" electricity. Get real, someone is paying the real costs.
Not sure what you're saying here, or how it relates to my point. I'm concerned for people who have or who are considering paying into scrypt.cc, not random others with "free" electricity.Also most of the people screaming about tiny amounts of BTC are from first world countries.
Ah, I clearly don't have access to the same data you do. Could you link me to it? Thanks!In fact at nearly 500 pages, the information is in the thread. The constant drone of warnings is just noise at this point. Not there is a lot of other information in this thread.
It is your right to post warning after warning and believe you are changing the world. It is also my right to realize how silly and pointless it is.
It is your right to post warning after warning and believe you are changing the world. It is also my right to realize how silly and pointless it is.
I'm not posting warning after warning: I'm challenging anyone who attempts to minimise or obfuscate the risks. Realise all you like, and posting here is your right, but if you post your thoughts expect to be challenged. Back to my original question - what do you get out of your post?