One of the reasons I don't fully adopt M. Armstrong's ideas is that he often predicts facts that he has no historical data to map them fully. Imagine a problem consisted from 5 equations with 6 or 7 unknown variables. You can only guess! Yes, there's a great chance you're going to match a couple of them right, but under no circumstances you would be sure about all of them.

The EU (as we know it) is only a couple of decades old. The historical data representing its format, its politics and ecosystem is pretty new regarding, let's say the USA's state infrastructure. There's absolutely no way you can predict with 100% certainty what will happen. He can be as wrong as anyone else predicting that the EU will stand strong and keep its state bonds without a single fracture (which is an equally insane claim).

I will repeat it once more: NO ONE CAN PREDICT THE FUTURE UNLESS HE SOMEHOW MANUFACTURED IT!
I will stand right against M.Armstrong's loyals, until someone proves me wrong. There's only one way to it; M.Armstrong himself prove me that everything he predicted is right. Which he didn't.

If on the other hand, IF someone manufactures a crisis in order to promote a (prefabricated) solution... Then, he's our oracle alright.

https://wikileaks.org/eu-military-refugees/