[..]
I regret things ended this way but I simply cant condone what happened regarding the Zeuner's crytographic peer review. Chasing the market smacks of running before walking. Some might consider the above an attempt at FUD but really it documents the first 11 days of SDC, a time which produced 95% of coins in an chaotic manner.
You will not hear from me or any of my avatars again.
You have my solemn word. Goodbye.
ps might show strength if you dont delete this post and actually respond to the questions it raises.
Just say you want your 0.3 BTC back from the review donations, man.
I can't comprehend why else would you be so attached to the review, when the decentralized market, new HD wallet and more is in development right now (which are, let's face is - superior). FYI, I've donated for review as well (same amount as you did) - do you hear me bitch about it? I'll gladly postpone the review for the market and HD wallet.
Your argument about faulty code (and no review) is invalid, since as we know, it's open source and publicly on Github.
Sure it doesn't mean that the code is flawless, but it's certainly not security through obscurity and everyone capable enough is free to explore it and file issues.
(Btw why do you want answers to your questions, when we won't hear from
any of you again? Makes sense.)